State of Nevada

Board of Medical Examiners
Press Release


Released August 28, 2000 

Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners Takes Disciplinary Action Against 6 Medical Doctors and 1 Physician Assistant

At its August 25 & 26, 2000 meeting, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners took the following disciplinary actions:

1)    The board accepted the Voluntary Surrender of License to Practice Medicine as a Physician’s Assistant in the State of Nevada While Under Investigation of Mark L. Knutson, P.A.-C.

2)    The board accepted the Voluntary Surrender of License to Practice Medicine in the State of Nevada While Under Investigation of Richard C. Sheretz, M.D.

3)    The board revoked the license to practice medicine in the state of Nevada of Larry D. Stoddard, M.D., and assessed him all of the costs of the board’s action against him. Dr. Stoddard was charged with having had his license to practice medicine indefinitely suspended in the state of Utah and agreeing to the revocation of his controlled substance license in that state.

4)    The board revoked the license to practice medicine in the state of Nevada of Phillip M. Milgram, M.D., and assessed him all of the costs of the board’s action against him. Dr. Milgram was charged with having surrendered his license to practice medicine in the state of California, failing to notify the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners of his surrender of his California license, and having had his license to practice medicine suspended in the state of New York.

5)    The board issued a written public reprimand to Pano Concha, M.D., and assessed him all of the costs of the board’s action against him. Dr. Concha was found guilty of engaging in the act of renewing a license to practice medicine in the state of Nevada by misrepresentation, or a false, misleading or inaccurate statement as a result of not telling the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners of his revocation of license to practice medicine in the state of California.

6)    The board revoked the license to practice medicine in the state of Nevada of Jeffrey R. Unger, M.D., and assessed him all of the costs of the board’s action against him. The board refused to accept Dr. Unger’s Voluntary Surrender of License to Practice Medicine in the State of Nevada While Under Investigation and took action to revoke his license based upon his false, misleading, or inaccurate statements and denying any out-of-state disciplinary actions against him, when in fact he had a pending disciplinary action by the Medical Board of California. Dr. Unger was also convicted of failing to report to the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners the action of the Medical Board of California against him.

7)    The board issued a written public reprimand to Richard S. Rigmaiden, M.D., and assessed him all of the costs of the board’s action against him. Dr. Rigmaiden was found guilty of having his license to practice medicine in the state of Nebraska modified or limited.

Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners Adopts Regulations on Non-Conventional Medical Care

The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners adopted new regulations setting forth the conditions under which Medical Doctors and Physician Assistants can practice by non-conventional methods. The regulations prohibit Medical Doctors and Physician Assistants from practicing medicine by utilizing any means or instrumentality that has a risk for a patient that is unreasonably greater than means or instrumentalities ordinarily utilized by physicians. The regulations set forth specific conditions under which non-conventional methods of treatment may be provided to patients.  The final version of the regulations adopted at the board's meeting on August 26, 2000, are as follow:
                                                                   
        LCB File No. R121-00
                                                                 PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE
                                                                 BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS


Explanation – Matter in italics is new; matter in brackets [omitted material]is material to be omitted
AUTHORITY:  NRS 630.020, 630.130(2)

Section 1.  Chapter 630 of NAC is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section to read as follows:
1. A licensee shall not practice medicine by utilizing any means or instrumentality that has a risk for a patient that is unreasonably greater than the means or instrumentality ordinarily utilized by physicians in good standing practicing in the same specialty or field or that is provided as a substitute for conventional treatment that has proven to be of substantial benefit to the patient.
2. Subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth, a licensee may practice medicine by utilizing any means or instrumentality that is not prohibited by this section.  Failure to practice by such means or instrumentality in conformity with the following conditions is grounds for disciplinary action:

          (a) Prior to offering advice about the means or instrumentality of treatment, the licensee shall undertake an assessment of the patient.  This assessment should include but not be limited to, conventional methods of diagnosis ordinarily utilized by physicians in good standing practicing in the same specialty or field, and may include non-conventional methods of diagnosis which shall be documented in the patient’s chart.  Such assessment shall include the following:
                (1) An adequate medical record;
                (2) Documentation as to whether such conventional treatment options ordinarily utilized by physicians in good standing practicing in the same specialty or field have been discussed with the patient and shall include referral input, if necessary;
                (3) Documentation as to whether such conventional treatment options have been tried, and if so, with what results, or a statement as to whether conventional treatment has been refused by the patient;
                (4) If a treatment is offered which is not considered to be conventional, documentation of informed consent for each treatment plan must be included (including documentation that the risks and benefits of the use of both the conventional and the other means or instrumentality of treatment were discussed with the patient or guardian);
                (5) A review of the current diagnosis and conventional treatment and documentation as to whether the other means or instrumentality of treatment could interfere with any other ongoing conventional treatment.
        (b) The licensee may offer the patient other means or instrumentality of treatment other than conventional treatment pursuant to a documented treatment plan tailored for the individual needs of the patient by which treatment progress or success can be evaluated with stated objectives such as pain relief and/or improved physical and/or psychosocial function.  Such a documented treatment plan shall consider pertinent medical history, previous medical records and physical examination, as well as the need for further testing, consultations, referrals, or the use of other treatment modalities.
        (c) The licensee may use the means or instrumentalities of treatment other than conventional treatment subject to documented periodic review of the patient’s care by the licensee at reasonable intervals in view of the individual circumstances of the patient in regard to progress toward reaching treatment objectives which takes into consideration the treatment prescribed, ordered or administered, as well as any new information about the etiology of the complaint.
        (d) Complete and accurate records of the care provided including the elements addressed in paragraphs (2)(a)(1) through (2)(a)(5) of this section shall be kept.
3. For purposes of this section, conventional treatment means those health care methods of diagnosis , treatments, or interventions that are offered by most licensed physicians as generally accepted methods of routine practice, based upon medical training, experience and review of the peer reviewed scientific literature, and which are ordinarily utilized by physicians in good standing practicing in the same specialty or field.

Section 2.       NAC 630.230, is hereby amended as follows:
1. A person who is licensed as a physician or physician’s assistant shall not:
        (a) Falsify records of health care;

        (b) Falsify the medical records of a hospital so as to indicate his presence at a time when he was not in attendance or falsify those records to indicate that procedures were performed by him which were in fact not performed by him;
          
(c) Render professional services to a patient while the physician or physician’s assistant is under the influence of alcohol or any controlled substance or is in any impaired mental or physical condition;
        (d) Acquire any controlled substances from any pharmacy or other source by misrepresentation, fraud, deception or subterfuge;
        (e) Prescribe anabolic steroids for any person to increase muscle mass for competitive or athletic purposes;
        (f) Make an unreasonable additional charge for tests in a laboratory, radiological services or other services
for testing which are ordered by the physician or physician’s assistant and performed outside his own office;
        [(g) Treat any patient in a manner not recognized scientifically as being beneficial;]
        [
(h)](g) Prescribe controlled substances listed in schedule II pursuant to NAC 453.520 or schedule III pursuant to NAC 453.530, controlled substance analogs, chorionic gonadotrophic hormones, thyroid preparations or thyroid synthetics for the control of weight;
        [(i)]  (h) Allow any person to act as a medical assistant in the treatment of a patient of the physician or physician’s assistant, unless the medical assistant has sufficient training to provide the assistance;

          
[(j)]  (i) Fail to provide adequate supervision of a medical assistant who is employed or supervised by the physician or physician’s assistant;
        
[(k)]  (j) If the person is a physician, fail to provide adequate supervision of a physician’s assistant or an advanced practitioner of nursing;
         
[(l)]  (k) Fail to honor the advance directive of a patient without informing the patient or the surrogate or guardian of the patient, and without documenting in the patient’s records the reasons for failing to honor the advance directive of the patient contained therein; or,
        
[(m)]  (l)  Engage in the practice of writing prescriptions for controlled substances to treat acute pain or chronic pain in a manner that deviates from the guidelines set forth in the Model Guidelines for the Use of Controlled Substances for the Treatment of Pain adopted by reference in section 1 of this regulation.
2. As used in this section:

         (a) “Acute pain” has the meaning ascribed to it in section 3 of the Model Guidelines for the Use of Controlled Substances for the Treatment of Pain adopted by reference in section 1 of this regulation.
         (b) “Chronic pain” has the meaning ascribed to it in section 3 of the Model Guidelines for the Use of Controlled Substances for the Treatment of Pain adopted by reference in section 1 of this regulation.
         (c) "Controlled substance analog" means:
                         (1) A substance whose chemical structure is substantially similar to the chemical structure of a controlled substance listed in schedule II pursuant to NAC 453.520 or schedule III pursuant to NAC 453.530; or
                                 
(2) A substance which has, is represented as having or is intended to have a stimulant, depressant or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system of a person that is substantially similar to, or greater than, the stimulant, depressant or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system of a person of a controlled substance listed in schedule II pursuant to NAC 453.520 or schedule III pursuant to NAC 453.530.
        (d) "Medical assistant" means any person who:
                         (1) Is employed by a physician or physician’s assistant;
                         (2) Is under the direction and supervision of the physician or physician’s assistant;
                         (3) Assists in the care of a patient; and
                         (4) Is not required to be certified or licensed by an administrative agency to provide that assistance.

Section 3.       NAC 630.280 is hereby amended to read as follows:

1.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, an applicant for licensure as a physician’s assistant must have the following qualifications:
        (a) If he has not practiced as a physician’s assistant or 12 months or more before applying for licensure in this state, he must, at the order of the board, have taken and passed the same examination to test medical competency as that given to applicants for initial licensure.
        (b) Be able to communicate adequately orally and in writing in the English language.

        (c) Be of good moral character and reputation.
        (
d) Have attended and completed a course of training in residence as a physician’s assistant approved by the Committee on Allied Health Education and Accreditation,the Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs, or the Accreditation Review Committee on Education for the Physician Assistant, which [is]areaffiliated with the American Medical Association.
        (e) Be certified by the National Commission on Certification of Physicians’ Assistants.
        (f)  Possess a high school diploma.
2. An applicant who was certified as a physician’s assistant in this state before July 1, 1985, and who otherwise satisfied the requirements for licensure set forth in NAC 630.280 to 630.415, inclusive, may practice as a physician’s assistant within the scope of practice in which he was certified before July 1, 1985, whether or not he is certified by the National Commission on Certification of Physicians’ Assistants.

Sec. 4.            NAC 630.470 is hereby amended to read as follows:
1.   The president of the board shall determine whether a hearing will be held before the board, a hearing officer or a panel of members of the board.  Any hearing before the board must be held before a majority of the members of the board.
2.  If a licensee fails to appear at a scheduled hearing and no continuance has been requested and granted, the evidence may be heard and the matter may be considered and disposed of on the basis of the evidence before the board, panel or hearing officer in the manner required by this section.
3.  The presiding member of the board or panel, or the hearing officer will call the hearing to order and proceed to take the appearances on behalf of the board, panel or hearing officer and the licensee, and other party and their counsel.  The board, panel or hearing officer will act upon any pending motions, stipulations and preliminary matters.  The notice of hearing, complaint, petition, answer, response or written stipulation becomes a part of the record without being read unless a party requests that the document be read verbatim into the record.  The board will present its evidence first and then the licensee will submit his evidence.  Closing statements by the parties may be allowed by the board, panel or hearing officer.
4. Prehearing depositions of witnesses and parties may not be taken and no formal discovery of evidence, except as otherwise provided in NAC 630.465, will be allowed.
5. The board, panel or hearing officer will hear the evidence presented, make appropriate rulings, on the admissibility of evidence, and maintain procedure and order during the hearing.  The board, panel or hearing officer may not dismiss the complaint.
6. The presiding member of the board or panel or the hearing officer may, upon his motion or the motion of a party, order a witness, other than the licensee, to be excluded from the hearing to prevent that witness from hearing the testimony of another witness at the hearing.

7. Briefs must be filed upon the order of the board, panel or hearing officer.  The time for filing briefs will be set by the board, panel or hearing officer.
8. The hearing officer conducting a hearing shall submit to the board a synopsis of the testimony taken at the hearing, and the hearing officer or panel of members of the board conducting the hearing shall make a recommendation to the board on veracity of witnesses where there is conflicting evidence or credibility is a determining factor.  A case shall be deemed submitted for decision by the board after the taking of evidence, the filing of briefs or the presentation of such oral arguments as may be permitted, the filing of the transcript of the hearing, and the filing of the synopsis of the testimony taken at the hearing.  The board will issue its order or render its decision within 90 days after the hearing or the submission of the case, whichever is later.

Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners Elects Officers

The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners re-elected Arne D. Rosencrantz, a public member and current President of the board to a third consecutive term as President of the board. Mr. Rosencrantz owns Garrett’s Furniture in Las Vegas and has served on the board for 7 years. Susan S. Buchwald, M.D., a Reno General and Vascular Surgeon, was re-elected to the position of Vice President of the board for a second term. Dr. Buchwald has previously served as President of the board and has been a member of the board for 7 years. Paul A. Stewart, M.D., a Pulmonary Diseases specialist from Las Vegas, was re-elected to the position of Secretary-Treasurer of the board for a second term. Dr. Stewart has served on the board for 5 years.


RETURN TO THE PRESS RELEASE TABLE OF CONTENTS


Home